Engagement & Workload Intake

Define the client entity, system boundary, and technical integration points.

Client Enterprise Name

AI Workload / System Name

Enterprise Role under the Act

Assessment Lead

Assessment Date

Engagement Version / ID

System Architectural Boundary & Data Pipeline Description

EU AI Act Risk Classification Engine

Screen against Article 5 (prohibited) and map to Annex III high-risk domains or GPAI obligations.

1. Prohibited AI Practices (Article 5)

Does the system deploy subliminal techniques, exploitative manipulation, social scoring by public authorities, real-time remote biometric identification in publicly accessible spaces for law enforcement (with limited exceptions), or untargeted scraping for facial recognition databases?

2. Risk Tier & Annex III / GPAI Mapping

Select the closest regulatory category. Most pure back-office transactional agents remain outside high-risk.

Determined Statutory Classification

Minimal / Non-High-Risk AI System

MINIMAL RISK

Most autonomous invoice-matching and ERP agent workloads that do not make decisions about individuals’ access to employment, credit, or essential services fall outside Annex III high-risk categories. Technical good-practice controls (logging, human oversight, documentation) remain strongly recommended.

Technical Conformity Matrix (Articles 9–15 & Annex IV)

Assess architecture against core technical requirements. Add evidence notes for each control.

Statutory Requirement	Architecture Criteria	Technical Posture	Evidence / Notes / Control ID

Architecture Remediation Blueprint

Technical fixes, air-gapped controls, logging architecture, and stage-gate governance. Suggestions auto-update from gaps.

1. Automated Event Logging & Traceability (Article 12)

2. Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) & Override Controls (Article 14)

3. Specification Governance & Stage-Gates

4. Data Governance, Lineage & Robustness (Articles 10 & 15)

5. Annex IV Technical Documentation Package

Executive Technical Dossier

Client-ready summary. Use Print / Save as PDF for formal delivery.

EU AI Act Technical Conformity & Architecture Audit

Nordic Manufacturing Oy

Advisory Firm: Bizzteq Advisory · Espoo, Finland
Principal Architect: Niraj Kakodkar
Assessment Date:
Engagement ID:

// EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & ARCHITECTURAL VERDICT

// RESIDUAL RISKS & PRIORITY GAPS

// ARCHITECTURAL REMEDIATION ROADMAP

// 30 / 60 / 90 DAY ACTION PLAN

// SCOPE & DISCLAIMER

This technical conformity assessment evaluates system architecture, data lineage, logging integrity, human-oversight mechanisms, and operational readiness against the technical requirements of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). It does not constitute legal advice, formal conformity assessment by a notified body, or a certificate of compliance. Final determination of risk classification and legal obligations remains the responsibility of the provider or deployer in consultation with qualified legal counsel.

Bizzteq Private Cockpit